Hi

Correcttion to myself. Sorry.

*SNIP*
> If you change java-runtime to java1-runtime it is perfectly correct.
> 
> > Can everyone agree that this is correct?  If not, can someone suggest a
> > line that will satisfy everyone?
> 
> But you do not need to depend on any of the above except java-common
> if you _know_ that it works if you compile it to native code for some
> purpose. The usefulness of that can be discussed.

>From policy:
 "Java libraries must depend on the needed runtime environment (java1-runtime and/or 
java2-runtime) but should not depend (only suggest) java-virtual-machine."

For more information:
http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/java-policy/x98.html

Regards,

// Ola

*SNIP*

-- 
 --------------------- Ola Lundqvist ---------------------------
/  [EMAIL PROTECTED]                     Annebergsslingan 37      \
|  [EMAIL PROTECTED]                 654 65 KARLSTAD          |
|  +46 (0)54-10 14 30                  +46 (0)70-332 1551       |
|  http://www.opal.dhs.org             UIN/icq: 4912500         |
\  gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36  4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 /
 ---------------------------------------------------------------


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to