On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 08:06:31PM -0800, Aaron Matthew Read wrote: > I am working on a repackaging of the SML/NJ package that splits the > sml runtime component apart from the sml compiler. The idea is to > facilitate the packaging of SML programs and libraries without > requiring the user to install the compiler. > > My main question is how to name these packages appropriately. Here is the
You might want to have a look at how this is done in ocaml (another ML implementation). In ocaml, the runtime system has been split off in order to accomodate application packages that are compiled into ocaml bytecode. Concerning developer packages it is probably not worth it to split it into too many packages (like seperate packages for lex, yacc, etc.). But it also dependes on the size of these packages. There is also a mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] where you can ask. -Ralf. -- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
