Thanks all.. except:

[19:11:24 main]$ dput -f mentors fed_0.94a-1_i386.changes
Checking signature on .changes
gpg: Signature made Tue Apr  5 10:07:24 2016 EDT using RSA key ID DE8473B0
gpg: Good signature from "Herb Gilliland (fed author) <
herb.gillil...@gmail.com>"
Good signature on /home/main/temp/fed_0.94a-1_i386.changes.
Checking signature on .dsc
gpg: Signature made Tue Apr  5 10:07:20 2016 EDT using RSA key ID DE8473B0
gpg: Good signature from "Herb Gilliland (fed author) <
herb.gillil...@gmail.com>"
Good signature on /home/main/temp/fed_0.94a-1.dsc.
Checksum doesn't match for /home/main/temp/fed_0.94a-1_i386.deb


Is this " done "?

On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 9:42 PM, Steffen Möller <steffen_moel...@gmx.de>
wrote:

> Hello,
>
>
> On 05/04/16 16:28, Herbert Elwood Gilliland III wrote:
> > Ok, nearly there... thanks for the help, still struggling on one
> > thing, here is the term log but basically the deb sig doesn't match
> > the other two and i'm not sure why.  i even tried replacing it:
> >
> > [10:18:21 main]$ debsigs -sign=origin -default-key="Herb Gilliland
> > (fed author) <herb.gillil...@gmail.com
> > <mailto:herb.gillil...@gmail.com>>" fed_0.94a-1_i386.deb
> >
> > You need a passphrase to unlock the secret key for
> > user: "Herb Gilliland (fed author) <herb.gillil...@gmail.com
> > <mailto:herb.gillil...@gmail.com>>"
> > 2048-bit RSA key, ID DE8473B0, created 2016-04-05
> >
> > [10:07:10 main]$ debsign fed_0.94a-1_i386.changes -k"Herb Gilliland
> > (fed author) <herb.gillil...@gmail.com <mailto:herb.gillil...@gmail.com
> >>"
> >  signfile fed_0.94a-1.dsc Herb Gilliland (fed author)
> > <herb.gillil...@gmail.com <mailto:herb.gillil...@gmail.com>>
> >
> > You need a passphrase to unlock the secret key for
> > user: "Herb Gilliland (fed author) <herb.gillil...@gmail.com
> > <mailto:herb.gillil...@gmail.com>>"
> > 2048-bit RSA key, ID DE8473B0, created 2016-04-05
> >
> >  signfile fed_0.94a-1_i386.changes Herb Gilliland (fed author)
> > <herb.gillil...@gmail.com <mailto:herb.gillil...@gmail.com>>
> >
> > You need a passphrase to unlock the secret key for
> > user: "Herb Gilliland (fed author) <herb.gillil...@gmail.com
> > <mailto:herb.gillil...@gmail.com>>"
> > 2048-bit RSA key, ID DE8473B0, created 2016-04-05
> >
> > Successfully signed dsc and changes files
>
> At this stage you are done. Looks good. The .debs are not signed but the
> signed .dsc file offers the MD5 hash values.
>
> [omitting the debsigs bits]
>
> You tell dput to e.g. upload the .changes files to mentors (or the
> ftp-masters for your sponsor) and it will ftp the changes file and all
> the other files referenced within with it.
>
> Congratulations!
>
> Steffen
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 2:22 AM, Gianfranco Costamagna
> > <costamagnagianfra...@yahoo.it <mailto:costamagnagianfra...@yahoo.it>>
> > wrote:
> >
> >     Hi,
> >     >Having trouble doing the signing.  I was able to sign the .deb but
> not the .changes, any hints?  I
> >     couldn't rectify the situation online yet
> >
> >
> >     debsign filename_version.changes
> >
> >     maybe you have to export your key on ~/.devscripts.
> >
> >     e.g. for my key
> >
> >     DEBSIGN_KEYID='92978A6E195E4921825F7FF0F34F09744E9F5DD9'
> >
> >
> >     cheers,
> >
> >     G.
> >     On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 9:50 AM, Gianfranco Costamagna
> >     <locutusofb...@debian.org <mailto:locutusofb...@debian.org>> wrote:
> >
> >     Hi Herbert
> >     >
> >     >if you want to maintain the package in Debian it would be easier
> >     to find a sponsor.
> >     >
> >     >
> >     >you might want to start from there
> >     >https://wiki.debian.org/IntroDebianPackaging
> >     >
> >     >you will probably need to check lintian and check-all-the-things
> >     to first review your packaging.
> >     >
> >     >after that, please upload to mentors.debian.net
> >     <http://mentors.debian.net> and open an RFS bug
> >     >
> >     >cheers,
> >     >
> >     >G.
> >     >
> >     >
> >     >
> >     >Il Sabato 19 Marzo 2016 21:11, Herbert Elwood Gilliland III
> >     <herb.gillil...@gmail.com <mailto:herb.gillil...@gmail.com>> ha
> >     scritto:
> >     >
> >     >
> >     >Hi Debian Mentors,
> >     >
> >     >I am a long-time user of nano - in fact it replaced my use of
> >     pico - but in 2011 after I made a request to the nano people and
> >     that was categorically denied, I decided to make an editor for
> >     linux using ncurses that was a little more modern and similar to
> >     editors found on desktop PCs like Windows and Mac. That's how fed
> >     (fedit) started.
> >     >
> >     >It has the feel of nano combined with feel of, say, Notepad++ or
> >     KomodoEdit.
> >     >
> >     >Anyway, I was within 3 or 4 features of what I would call a
> >     version 1.0, when I hit a roadblock trying to get it into a distro
> >     and decided to give up for a while.  Looking back at all of the
> >     features I packed into it, I know it deserves a home among the
> >     other terminal editors like emacs, vi, nano et al.  It's really
> >     _different_ than those editors, and should be able to stand on its
> >     own.  The problem is, not many people know about it or have it as
> >     a part of their linux experience.
> >     >
> >     >I've been using Debian since 1991 and I really would love it to
> >     be a part of the apt-get package downloading system, officially
> >     supported!  I have some time to devote to this, but not a ton, but
> >     I want to persevere so I can apt-get nano and also apt-get fed
> >     >
> >     >I'm willing to change to license it however it must be, I just
> >     really want people to experience some of the awesome features of fed
> >     >
> >     >fed incorporates some of the greatest features of an ncurses
> >     editor, but also in a familiar way regarding keystroes, and it has
> >     a 'perfect amount of features' rather than an absolute ton as its
> >     core offering.  It can be extended through short scripts using a
> >     plugin interface, in virtually any scripting language, but
> >     especially PHP, python, perl, shell scripts (so anything really).
> >     >
> >     >A video (which covers pretty much EVERYTHING AWESOME about fed
> >     and its prepackaged PHP plugins) is here:
> >     >https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vsc_NzxK67k
> >     >
> >     >
> >     >And the source is here, if anyone wants to try it out on their box:
> >     >http://sourceforge.net/projects/fed
> >     >
> >     >
> >     >I'd love to find a sponsor and have fed just an apt-get away on
> >     any Debian distro (Ubuntu etc) .. at least, that's what i'm trying
> >     to accomplish.
> >     >
> >     >TIA
> >     >-h3rb
> >     >
> >
> >
>
>

Reply via email to