Hi Adam,
>Sure, can do. I did most of the review already, and if we decide otherwise >wrt 1.6-pre1, can always unset. thanks a lot for that, it helps in avoiding double checking of packages :) and double reviews :D ># Note that 1.6 is bleeding edge and still needs polishing before it can ># replace 1.5. It is recommended you use 1.5. > >On the other hand, moving from SDL1.2 to SDL2 is a big change, so I >understand wanting to use the new version already, both for programs using >this library and to avoid doing this part of packaging twice. +1 for moving away from SDL1.2 >On the third hand, though, there's a significant risk the API/ABI might>change >before final 1.6. well, if 1.6 gets released in a short time, we might not even have reverse-dependencies in the archive, so... who cares? /me says something about putting the package on experimental cheers! and thanks Gianfranco
