Le 16/05/2016 15:16, Gianfranco Costamagna a écrit : > Hi Eric, > > > >> Well autotools-dev already used. No changes here. >> About autoreconf, I'm not familiar with it. >> I installed it to test it. Since all seems ok, I've not removed it. > > https://wiki.debian.org/Autoreconf > > I was talking more about removing autotools-dev I think there are too many changes in this release. Is it okay to remove autoreconf for now, and replace autotools-dev by autoreconf at next release ? > > > 3) +Replaces: gnustep-common (<< 2.6.8-1) > > this is something I don't understand. > If you upgrade gnustep make bin package with old gnustep-common installed, > we need to replace the gnustep-config.1 manpage. > > > that file is currently inside gnustep-common > > and you moved into gnustep-make > https://packages.debian.org/sid/alpha/gnustep-common/filelist Yes, the executable was in gnustep-make, thus i moved the manpage to gnustep-make.
> > you probably need some more keywords to ensure a good upgrade path > https://wiki.debian.org/PackageTransition Reorg: gnustep-common and gnustep-make existed; move one file from gnustep-common to gnustep-make; new gnustep-common does not require new gnustep-make Breaks: gnustep-make (<<2.6.8-1) Breaks: gnustep-common (<<2.6.8-1) Is it okay to do that? >> Yes, this is a consequence of the debian/rules rewriting. > > line 25, you could add something like "remove control.in file, useless now" > or similar wording, that one was my question OK, i m going to do that > >> I tested it with latest upstream version of gnustep-base, gnustep-gui >> and and gnustep-back, >> and all seems okay. I >> tried it with several GNUstep related debian packages and all seems to >> works fine. >> I also tried to rebuild several debian gnustep packages with it and I >> did not find any FTBFS. > > nice indeed, so please wait some more time, and ping me back in 7-15 days if > nobody > picked up the work in the meanwhile. OK, I'm going to update gnustep make to do improvements you suggested. Since I am not familiar with mentors rules, I have a question : Should I prepare a new revision (ie 2.6.8-2) or should I update the 2.6.8-1 revision and reupload it ? Thanks Eric