PING! On Tuesday 24 May 2016 10:51:59 Pali Rohár wrote: > Hi! Now after month, any news regarding this package? > > On Wednesday 27 April 2016 12:53:06 Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > > Hi Pali and mentors, > > > > (redirecting the question to -mentors, because I don't have a > > strong opinion on this) > > > > >Looks like we do not have exact license text as those file "were > > >generated" by brute-force methods by more people and put into > > >public domain. People names (or nick names) are already included > > >in copyright file. That is all what I know and cannot do more. If > > >there are or there are not law problems it is probably question > > >for other people... > > > > there should be a verbatim copy of the license included in the > > upstream tarball > > > > look e.g. to > > > > https://ftp-master.debian.org/REJECT-FAQ.html > > License II and III sections > > > > > > so, either you have to document how the license is obtained, or how > > to reproduce the files generation. > > > > I know licenses are a waste of time for somebody (they were for me > > when I started my contributions in Debian :p )... > > but they are the best way to get your package rejected by > > ftpmasters! > > > > So, this point is really a showstopper for the inclusion in Debian > > of the tool (BTW if you want to ask ftpmasters about their opinion > > let me know their answer). > > > > I would like to avoid uploading and get a reject, but I would > > consider an upload with a ping to ftpmasters about this issue. > > > > cheers, > > > > Gianfranco > > > > > > Il Martedì 26 Aprile 2016 23:07, Pali Rohár <pali.ro...@gmail.com> > > ha scritto: > > > > On Thursday 21 April 2016 10:16:29 Pali Rohár wrote: > > > On Tuesday 19 April 2016 08:36:49 Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > >There is no more info about it just as it is public domain, no > > > > >more license texts... What to write into paragraph then?? > > > > > > > > everything is a license, and public domain is a license too. > > > > https://codesearch.debian.net/results/License:%20public-domain/ > > > > page _0 > > > > > > > > G. > > > > > > Looks like we do not have exact license text as those file "were > > > generated" by brute-force methods by more people and put into > > > public domain. People names (or nick names) are already included > > > in copyright file. That is all what I know and cannot do more. > > > If there are or there are not law problems it is probably > > > question for other people... > > > > Gianfranco, what else needs to be done? I think I done everything > > what I was able to do...
-- Pali Rohár pali.ro...@gmail.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
