On Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 01:03:46PM +0200, Christoph Berg wrote: > Re: Re: FAQ for debian-mentors [Joe Nahmias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Thu, Sep 04, 2003 > at 10:49:09AM -0400, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>] > > 4) Same section, there should be a step 3.5 which says something > > like: "Upload the source package to machine for public review, > > mentors.debian.net provides a service that is useful for this purpose". > > You have to stress that people actually upload the _source_ package. If > not told, they tend to provide i386 binaries.
Is "all of the files (.orig.tar.gz, diff, changes, dsc, and binary package(s)) relating to your package" not strong enough? I would have thought it would have been clear enough. Just writing "source package" would be less informative, IMHO. This way, at least, there's half a chance that people will notice that they're missing some files... If you'd like to suggest a better wording for the paragraph, I'd be happy to include it. I just can't think of a clearer way to express it. - Matt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]