control: tags -1 moreinfo Hi >remove gcc, >let sdl 1.2 (remove unused sdl2) >update versions from unstable
oh... no sdl2 ready code? >>fixed. >>i only can test in these archs, but i changed it to => any > >Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}, libsdl1.2 (>= 1.2.15) libsdl1.2 explicit runtime dependency might be "droppable", did you test it? just do a build, and open the deb file section debian/control why libsdl1.2 is not picked up? >> some (most) of them looks like embedded libraries > >it's part of uptream source. can i do something to make it better? > yes, remove them, repack the source (debian/copyright has a nice Files-Excluded feature) and drop them from copyright. and package them separately if not yet in debian (and useful outside this package) >http://cvs.synchro.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/src/sbbs3/zmodem.h?revision=1.54&view=markup > >Unfortunately, this was after 1.0 release date, and it was made through >my work to contact everyone involved and good response from them. ok, you might package an upstream snapshot, or clarify this in copyright file >I think that can parse file by file to fine copyright settings. >i update it, please check, >I want to the package fit the debian legal requeriments, the code is >gpl, lgpl and some files bsd. i think that all are dfsg >The non-dfsg part was cryplib and was removed via patch (the app can be >used without that lib) ok let me know how you want to proceed with the above points cheers, G.