On 11.10.2016 14:41, Eriberto wrote: > Hi Dominik, > > 2016-10-11 8:53 GMT-03:00 Dominik George <n...@naturalnet.de>: >> >> I wonder what of these two options is the "correct" solution for an >> upstream that is not watch'able (e.g. has no release tarballs, etc.) - >> besides making upstream have release tarballs, that is ;): >> >> a) no watch file >> b) a watch file with only comments >> >> In case a), lintian complains and proposes to place a watch file with a >> comment explaining why it is otherwise empty [0]. >> >> In case b), (at least( the DMD [1] complains about empty uscan output. > > To avoid a false impression that you ignored the watch file by > laziness and to inform an actual status, I created three fake > packages[1]. These packages say if there no upstream site, if there no > release in upstream site or if the upstream site there a package but > doesn't allow track it (using a JavaScript to block it, for example). > > Some people are using my fake packages and you can see the result in > my DDPO[2]. Look at 0.No-Site, 0.No-Release and 0.No-Track. > > Feel free if you want to use this solution. > > [1] https://people.debian.org/~eriberto/#fake-packages > [2] https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=eribe...@debian.org > > Regards, > > Eriberto
Great thing! DS -- 4096R/DF5182C8 http://www.danielstender.com/blog/
