Fcc: +sent Subject: Re: Bug#841270: RFS: debrequest/0.2 ITP In-reply-to: <1476954418.4434.8.ca...@43-1.org> References: <e1bwlai-00078r...@fencepost.gnu.org> <1476954418.4434.8.ca...@43-1.org> Comments: In-reply-to Ansgar Burchardt <ans...@debian.org> message dated "Thu, 20 Oct 2016 11:06:58 +0200." Sign: Yes --------
[2016-10-20 11:06] Ansgar Burchardt <ans...@debian.org> > It might be more useful to add this to `devscripts` or some other > existing package rather than adding a new package. Pros: - `debrequest' is developer tool, and probably will be installed only with `devscripts', so from user perspective making it part of `devscripts' is right thing. Cons: - `debrequest' is written in Python3. Including it into `devscripts', written in Perl would not facilate code reuse and will complicate maintainace. Depends, whether anyone in devescrips team can/want maintain python3 code. Added devscripts-devel@ into thread. Your opinions, devscripts maintainers? -- X-Web-Site: https://sinsekvu.github.io | Note that I process my email in batch, Accept-Languages: eo,ru,en | at most once every 24 hours. If matter Accept: text/plain, text/x-diff | is urgent, you have my phone number.