On 11/08/2016 09:11 AM, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > control: owner -1 ! > control: tag -1 moreinfo > > On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 09:50:51PM -0700, Dan Mick wrote: >> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "mlocate" > > o/
Thanks, Mattia. > (though that template ought to be more clever and don't claim "my > package" for a NMU :P) I wondered about that, but the instructions were pretty explicit. Mongo only pawn in game of life. >> https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/mlocate/mlocate_0.26-1.1.dsc > >> mlocate (0.26-1.1) unstable; urgency=medium >> >> * Non-maintainer upload. >> * Add cephfs to PRUNEFS and /var/lib/ceph to PRUNEPATHS >> Closes: #786433 > > Now, that .dsc has a lot of noise: > it creates stuff in .pc and debian/patches, which is completely > irrelevant for this package that is not debian source format > '3.0 (quilt)' (it's not specified, hence 1.0), and it's not using any > patch system > > Am I right that the only relevant change is this? > > diff -u mlocate-0.26/debian/updatedb.conf mlocate-0.26/debian/updatedb.conf > --- mlocate-0.26/debian/updatedb.conf > +++ mlocate-0.26/debian/updatedb.conf > @@ -3,2 +3,2 @@ > -PRUNEPATHS="/tmp /var/spool /media" > -PRUNEFS="NFS nfs nfs4 rpc_pipefs afs binfmt_misc proc smbfs autofs iso9660 > ncpfs coda devpts ftpfs devfs mfs shfs sysfs cifs lustre tmpfs usbfs udf > fuse.glusterfs fuse.sshfs curlftpfs" > +PRUNEPATHS="/tmp /var/spool /media /var/lib/ceph" > +PRUNEFS="NFS nfs nfs4 rpc_pipefs afs binfmt_misc proc smbfs autofs iso9660 > ncpfs coda devpts ftpfs devfs mfs shfs sysfs cifs lustre tmpfs usbfs udf > fuse.glusterfs fuse.sshfs curlftpfs ceph fuse.ceph" > > > If so, please clean up d/patches and .pc, and rebuild. Run debdiff on > the previous version of the package to make sure the thing is clean. Yep, that's the only relevant change, and I would have sworn it was quilt. I'll redo. > I'd also ask you to close the ubuntu bug too (just add 'LP: #1281074' in > the changelog), that way when the package will be synced/merged it'll be > automatically closed (actually, not sure for the "merged" part, but > anyway…). Super. Thanks again. > Then.. I'd like to rewrite the whole packaging part of that package, but > this is a NMU and changes should be minimal.... >