Hi Dmitry! El jue., 3 de ene. de 2019 a la(s) 01:13, Dmitry Bogatov (kact...@debian.org) escribió:
> > As other folks already mentioned, you do not use CC: you already use > X-Debbugs-CC. In this particular case, email with bug number got > filtered-out as duplicate in my setup. > > Ok. The next time I will use just X-Debbugs-CC > [2018-12-31 00:16] eamanu15 <emmanuelaria...@gmail.com> > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pygithub" > > > > * Package name : pygithub > > Version : 1.43.3-1 > > Upstream Author : Adam Dangoor <adamdang...@gmail.com> > > Vincent Jacques <vinc...@vincent-jacques.net> > > Jeremy Phelps <jphe...@linuxfoundation.org> > > * URL : https://pypi.python.org/pypi/PyGithub > > * License : LGPL-3+ > > Section : python > > > > It builds those binary packages: > > > > python-github - Access to full Github API v3 from Python2 > > python3-github - Access the full Github API v3 from Python3 > > Looks fine, but I do not understand following line in `debian/rules': > > rm -rfv debian/python3-github/usr/lib/python3.* > > What is removed and why same statement it is not needed for python2 > version? Comment in `debian/rules' would be nice. > Really I don't remember and I don't sit down in front of own system right now. > > And some very minor suggestions: > > * Standards-Version slightly outdated > * debhelper-compat style reduces redundancy > * Probably F-variables could be used to avoid repetition in > binary package descriptions? (See dpkg-substvars(5)) > Thanks for your suggestions I will work in it. > > I do not know habits of Python Modules Team, but would not it be more > apporiate for this packages to be sponsored by DD from team? I can check > basic things, but I do not know whole picture, like transitions or > reverse dependencies. > Yes, I'll keep looking. > > PS. I am glad to see that pygithub finally moved under aegis of > Python Modules Team. > Regards! -- Arias Emmanuel http://eamanu.com Github/Gitlab; @eamanu Debian: @eamanu-guest