On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 08:23:05AM +0000, Thomas Viehmann wrote: > > It'll probably be more timely and less bandwidth intensive to track -changes... > Well, I mostly have Packages/Sources for unstable available. In my book, I prefer > parsing those over automatically processing email. Also, it doesn't matter if you > miss a batch of stuff or things like this.
The timeliness issue still lurks, though. If I update Packages daily, that's up to 24 hours when a package is in that it's being advertised as not being in. Tracking -changes gets things more quickly (although there is, I guess, the issue of NEW uploads, which are going to suck either way). - Matt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
