* Martin Godisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-02-20 22:35:46 +0100]: > On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 11:36:33 -0500, O. Moskalenko wrote: > > > * Martin Godisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-02-20 17:12:12 +0100]: > > > > I suggest to put 1.1.5 into unstable/testing and 1.2.0~cvs into > > > experimental. > > > CVS is stable. Frankly, the release is pretty much a CVS snapshot. 1.2.0 > > will be released around the end of April, so it will probably happen way > > before sarge is out. I think that the effort is better spent working out > > problems due to the clash of debian and upstream policy on executable > > libs and non-FHS file placement then on maintaining two separate > > versions. Please tell my why it is not so if you think contrary. > > I don't say you're wrong. It's more a matter of personal taste. I don't > like CVS snapshot packages, think the upstream author should know when > to release. As a user, I like released software on my system. It's also > a question how the CVS tree is handled between releases. I cannot speak > for scribus, and if you're the Debian maintainer it's your decision. > > Kind regards, > > Martin
Thank you for your thoughts on the matter. Regards, Alex. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
