On Mon, 28 Jun 2021 21:38:21 +0200 Joerg Jaspert <jo...@debian.org> wrote:
> Assuming fast == wide spread, then you want something with the > smallest amount of requirement/restrictions for those taking it. > > If you truly do not care who takes it and whyt they do with it, nor > want to be mentioned anywhere, something like CC0 is your way. > > If you, at least theoretically, want to have your name appear > somewhere, but don't care much anything else, "MIT" (expat) or BSD 3 > clause would be the thing. > > If you do want to ensure it stays free software, other licenses apply. > > > Now, point 2: None of those 3 licenses do make it any trouble > whatsoever to use your code. (CC0 *IMO* the worst one, just from its > size :) ). I was thinking about the case of a project that prefer to merge contribution under its license, that may be different from BSD..anyway it's probably a minor problem. Thanks for your help Lorenzo