On Thu, Oct 6, 2022 at 8:33 AM Tobias Frost <t...@debian.org> wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 04, 2022 at 09:02:07AM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 4, 2022 at 8:50 AM Mathieu Malaterre <ma...@debian.org> wrote: > > > > > > [cc me please] > > > > > > Hi there, > > > > > > I am staring at the autopkgtest results for jpeg-xl: > > > > > > * https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/jpeg-xl > > > > > > It seems CI consider there is a regression for s390x: > > > > > > [...] > > > Reading state information... > > > E: Unable to locate package libjxl-tools > > > [...] > > > > > > * > > > https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/s390x/j/jpeg-xl/26649194/log.gz > > > > > > Is there a way to de-activate explicitly s390x from the default > > > autpkgtest list ? > > > > I'll try a > > > > Architecture: !s390x > > The "!" syntax is not supported in Architecture:, you'd > have to spell out all archs in d/control..
I stole the syntax from: https://salsa.debian.org/toolchain-team/gcc/-/commit/1d32ce5e1a28d741e2bc97e5db7d0df5f330e058 > There was a recent discussion on -devel, and one suggestion [1] > was to do something like: > > Build-Depends: package-is-broken-on-ppc64el [ppc64el],... > > [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2022/09/msg00293.html oh, well. I'll try yet-another-cross-finger upload then thanks !