On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 at 21:04, Nilesh Patra <nil...@mailbox.org> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 11 August 2023 1:32:07 am IST, Nilesh Patra <nil...@nileshpatra.info> 
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >On 4 August 2023 8:21:50 pm IST, M Hickford <mirth.hickf...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org
> >>
> >>Dear mentors,
> >>
> >>I am looking for a sponsor for my package "git-credential-azure":
> >>
> >> * Package name     : git-credential-azure
> >>   Version          : 0.2.1-1
> >>   Upstream contact : M Hickford <mirth.hickf...@gmail.com>
> >> * URL              : https://github.com/hickford/git-credential-azure
> >
> >The upstream readme says that this software is in alpha. Do you consider it 
> >ready to go to testing or is it better suited for experimental?

Thanks Nilesh for your reply. Ready for testing I'd say.

> >
> >I think it's the latter, but you probably know best.
>
> And since git-credential-manager is a mature alternative, what advantage does 
> credential-azure have over it?

Principally Linux arm64 support. I've updated the readme.

>
> Why not package credential-manager itself? Why not get the enhancements 
> merged into the alternative instead?

Git Credential Manager is prohibitively difficult to package because
it's developed in .NET
https://github.com/dotnet/source-build/discussions/2960

>
> Thanks,
> Nilesh

Reply via email to