Your message dated Mon, 12 Jan 2026 00:07:08 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#1124766: RFS: rdiff-backup-fs/1.0.0-11 [ITA] -- Fuse
filesystem for accessing rdiff-backup archives
has caused the Debian Bug report #1124766,
regarding RFS: rdiff-backup-fs/1.0.0-11 [ITA] -- Fuse filesystem for accessing
rdiff-backup archives
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
1124766: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1124766
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "rdiff-backup-fs":
* Package name : rdiff-backup-fs
Version : 1.0.0-11
Upstream contact : [fill in name and email of upstream]
* URL : https://code.google.com/p/rdiff-backup-fs/
* License : GPL-3+
* Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/debian/rdiff-backup-fs
Section : utils
The source builds the following binary packages:
rdiff-backup-fs - Fuse filesystem for accessing rdiff-backup archives
To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:
https://mentors.debian.net/package/rdiff-backup-fs/
Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this command:
dget -x
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/rdiff-backup-fs/rdiff-backup-fs_1.0.0-11.dsc
Changes since the last upload:
rdiff-backup-fs (1.0.0-11) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Adopt package (Closes: #831722).
* Updated fuse3.patch to fix 32-bit build failure.
Regards,
Syed Shahrukh Hussain.
--
OSS Revival
Empowering open-source, one project at a time.
*https://ossrevival.org/ <https://ossrevival.org/>*
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Am 07.01.26 um 08:57 schrieb Syed Shahrukh Hussain:
On Wed, Jan 07, 2026 at 08:46:44AM +0100, Bastian Germann wrote:
Which 32-bit build failure are you addressing? I do not see any.
Thank you for taking a look.
The fuse3 port build was failing on i386 so i have updated the patch.
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/rdiff-backup-fs/-/jobs/8822639#L1150
This was not uploaded but later on corrected. You can see CI for the
uploaded -10 revision passing on
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/rdiff-backup-fs/-/jobs/8851602
So, CI is the same as buildd. I do not think your recent change
should be included because it unnecessarily complicates setting
_FILE_OFFSET_BITS which is already valid on 64 bit archs.
Please reopen this when you are coming up with a different -11 revision.
--- End Message ---
