On 5/7/26 03:57, Tobias Frost wrote:
NMUs are not a appropiate way to transfer maintainership and also not a way to signal the intention to do so. The NMUs procedure defines what changes are are appropiate and how to perform a NMU. Please check the developers reference for details. If you want to become the maintainer of the package, read up on the ITS process, this might be the/a better approach for your case. But note that being the maintainer is a long time commitment to take care about the package. Cheers,
Thank you for the info. I will read up on this process more thoroughly before attempting an NMU in the future.
In the mean time for this package, I will propose my changes as salsa merge requests.
