Your message dated Wed, 15 Jul 2026 05:24:37 -0500 with message-id <[email protected]> and subject line Re: RFS: disgreet/0.1.0-1 [ITP] -- greetd terminal frontend with pixelated image background has caused the Debian Bug report #1139191, regarding RFS: disgreet/0.1.1-1 [ITP] -- greetd terminal frontend with pixelated image background to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected] immediately.) -- 1139191: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1139191 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "disgreet": * Package name : disgreet Version : 0.1.0-1 Upstream contact : Dvorak Chen <[email protected]> * URL : https://github.com/dvorakchen/disgreet * License : Apache-2.0 * Vcs : https://github.com/dvorakchen/disgreet/tree/debian Section : admin The source builds the following binary packages: disgreet - greetd terminal frontend with pixelated image background To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/disgreet/ Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/disgreet/disgreet_0.1.0-1.dsc Changes for the initial release: disgreet (0.1.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium . * Initial release. (Closes: #1138993) Regards, -- Dvorak Chen
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---Hello, Please clean some of this up on your next upload: Running lintian... N: I: disgreet source: older-debian-watch-file-standard 4 [debian/watch] N: N: The version= line in the debian/watch file in this package declares an N: older version. Please upgrade when you have a chance. N: N: Please refer to the uscan(1) manual page for details. N: N: Visibility: info N: Show-Always: no N: Check: debian/watch/standard N: N: I: disgreet source: out-of-date-standards-version 4.7.2 (released 2025-02-27) (current is 4.7.4) N: N: The source package refers to a Standards-Version older than the one that N: was current at the time the package was created (according to the N: timestamp of the latest debian/changelog entry). Please consider updating N: the package to current Policy and setting this control field N: appropriately. N: N: If the package is already compliant with the current standards, you don't N: have to re-upload the package just to adjust the Standards-Version control N: field. However, please remember to update this field next time you upload N: the package. N: N: See /usr/share/doc/debian-policy/upgrading-checklist.txt.gz in the N: debian-policy package for a summary of changes in newer versions of N: Policy. N: N: Please refer to N: https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/upgrading-checklist.html for N: details. N: N: Visibility: info N: Show-Always: no N: Check: fields/standards-version N: N: P: disgreet source: maintainer-manual-page [debian/disgreet.1] N: N: The maintainer keeps a manual page in ./debian. Please forward the manual N: page upstream and ask them to include in their version control system, and N: in their next release. N: N: If the manual page was already forwarded or rejected, or the upstream is N: gone, please override the tag and annotate it with a suitable comment. N: N: Please refer to social contract item 2, Coordination with upstream N: developers (Section 3.1.4) in the Debian Developer's Reference, and N: Changes to the upstream sources (Section 4.3) in the Debian Policy Manual N: for details. N: N: Visibility: pedantic N: Show-Always: no N: Check: debian/manual-pages N: Renamed from: maintainer-manpage N: N: P: disgreet source: package-uses-old-debhelper-compat-version 13 N: N: This package uses a debhelper compatibility level that is no longer N: recommended. Please consider using the recommended level. N: N: For most packages, the best way to set the compatibility level is to N: specify debhelper-compat (= X) as a Build-Depends in debian/control. You N: can also use the debian/compat file or export DH_COMPAT in debian/rules. N: N: If no level is selected debhelper defaults to level 1, which is N: deprecated. N: N: Please refer to the debhelper(7) manual page for details. N: N: Visibility: pedantic N: Show-Always: no N: Check: debhelper N: N: P: disgreet source: redundant-priority-optional-field [debian/control:3] N: N: This package currently sets the Priority field in the debian/control file N: to "optional". N: N: As of dpkg version 1.22.13, this field is set to "optional" by default. As N: such, in this case the Priority field is redundant and should be removed. N: N: Visibility: pedantic N: Show-Always: no N: Check: debian/control/field/priority N: N: P: disgreet source: redundant-rules-requires-root-no-field [debian/control:5] N: N: This package currently sets the Rules-Requires-Root field in the N: debian/control file to "no". N: N: As of dpkg version 1.22.13, this field is set to "no" by default. As such, N: in this case the Rules-Requires-Root field is redundant and should be N: removed. N: N: Visibility: pedantic N: Show-Always: no N: Check: debian/control/field/rules-requires-root N: N: P: disgreet source: upstream-metadata-file-is-missing N: N: This source package is not Debian-native but it does not have a N: debian/upstream/metadata file. N: N: The Upstream MEtadata GAthered with YAml (UMEGAYA) project is an effort to N: collect meta-information about upstream projects from any source package. N: This file is in YAML format and it is used in to feed the data in the N: UltimateDebianDatabase. For example, it can contains the way the authors N: want their software be cited in publications and some bibliographic N: references about the software. N: N: Please add a debian/upstream/metadata file. N: N: Please refer to https://dep-team.pages.debian.net/deps/dep12/ and N: https://wiki.debian.org/UpstreamMetadata for details. N: N: Visibility: pedantic N: Show-Always: no N: Check: debian/upstream/metadata N: N: X: disgreet source: debian-watch-does-not-check-openpgp-signature [debian/watch] N: N: This watch file does not specify a means to verify the upstream tarball N: using a cryptographic signature. N: N: If upstream distributions provides such signatures, please use the N: pgpsigurlmangle options in this watch file's opts= to generate the URL of N: an upstream OpenPGP signature. This signature is automatically downloaded N: and verified against a keyring stored in debian/upstream/signing-key.asc N: N: Of course, not all upstreams provide such signatures but you could request N: them as a way of verifying that no third party has modified the code after N: its release (projects such as phpmyadmin, unrealircd, and proftpd have N: suffered from this kind of attack). N: N: Please refer to the uscan(1) manual page for details. N: N: Visibility: pedantic N: Show-Always: no N: Check: debian/watch N: Renamed from: debian-watch-does-not-check-gpg-signature N: debian-watch-may-check-gpg-signature N: This tag is experimental. N: N: X: disgreet: hardening-no-fortify-functions [usr/bin/disgreet] N: N: This package provides an ELF binary that lacks the use of fortified libc N: functions. Either there are no potentially unfortified functions called by N: any routines, all unfortified calls have already been fully validated at N: compile-time, or the package was not built with the default Debian N: compiler flags defined by dpkg-buildflags. If built using dpkg-buildflags N: directly, be sure to import CPPFLAGS. N: N: NB: Due to false-positives, Lintian ignores some unprotected functions N: (e.g. memcpy). N: N: Please refer to https://wiki.debian.org/Hardening and Bug#673112 for N: details. N: N: Visibility: info N: Show-Always: no N: Check: binaries/hardening N: This tag is experimental. N: I: Lintian run successful (worst tag: info) Otherwise, enjoy: $ dput ftp-master ../disgreet_0.1.1-1_amd64.changes Uploading disgreet using ftp to ftp-master (host: ftp.upload.debian.org; directory: /pub/UploadQueue/) running allowed-distribution: check whether a local profile permits uploads to the target distribution running protected-distribution: warn before uploading to distributions where a special policy applies running checksum: verify checksums before uploading running suite-mismatch: check the target distribution for common errors running gpg: check GnuPG signatures before the upload Uploading disgreet_0.1.1-1.dsc Uploading disgreet_0.1.1.orig.tar.gz Uploading disgreet_0.1.1-1.debian.tar.xz Uploading disgreet-dbgsym_0.1.1-1_amd64.deb Uploading disgreet_0.1.1-1_amd64.buildinfo Uploading disgreet_0.1.1-1_amd64.deb Uploading disgreet_0.1.1-1_amd64.changes It will now show up in the Debian NEW queue, where it's either accepted or rejected. Since you're upstream, it wouldn't hurt to explicitly put your name in the LICENSE file where the placeholder is towards the bottom of the file, that way it's abundantly clear what licensing is. I've seen much worse, so I don't expect a reject, but worth fixing for next time. Best regards, Simon Quigley [email protected]
--- End Message ---
