On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 11:16:23AM +0200, Christoph Wegscheider wrote: > Adam D. Barratt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> The final version will be labelled 1.0.0-1 of course. > > > > Erm, no, please don't. 1.0.0 is an NMU version number. > I thougth x-1.1 would be a NMU version number?
Indeed, in fact, where there will be a 1.1betax i'll use the 1.99-1+betax version number, that is really clear, and shorter than a 0.99-1+1.0-beta4 but in fact, the non-official debian repository where i dput my packages atm had a q&dirty package named 1.0-beta1 and I had to produce version numbers greater than this one (the historical thing) starting with 1.0, my version numbering will follow a +betax scheme but for the 1.0 betas (and maybe pre versions) I'll have to follow the old scheme for backward compatibility -- Pierre Habouzit http://www.madism.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature