> > * On all three packages, the arm build failed because of an > > unsatisfiable build dependency that was the result of a timing > > problem. These should succeed now as the problem with the > > dependent package has been cleared. I emailed > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] to request these to be rebuilt. Is there > > In this case you don't have to do anything about arm for your package: > > http://www.buildd.net/cgi/package_status?all_pkg=xerces25&searchtype=go > > arm: libs/xerces25_2.5.0-2: Dep-Wait by buildd_arm-europa [extra:out-of-date] > Dependencies: libicu28-dev > Previous state was Building until 2004 Jun 17 20:04:28
Okay, thanks. I had been looking at build logs and saw the maybe-failed but I didn't check the status. (I didn't know about this, though I had a bookmark to buildd.debian.net. Oops.) > BUT: > > arm: libs/icu28_2.8-3: Building by buildd_arm-netwinder [optional:uncompiled] > Previous state was Needs-Build until 2004 Jun 13 02:33:44 > > You might want to check this out. It certainly isn't still > building. Did it fail? Should it be retried? Does it need bugsfixes? > Check for buildd logs and bugreports. Yes, it seems the most recent arm build failed, but yet the current icu28 (2.8-3) is in testing. Perhaps someone built it manually. There are no bugs posted again icu28. > Check buildd.net: > > arm: libs/xerces23_2.3.0-3: Dep-Wait by buildd_arm-europa [extra:out-of-date] > > mips: libs/xerces23_2.3.0-3: Not-For-Us [extra:out-of-date] > mipsel: libs/xerces23_2.3.0-3: Installed by rmurray-repeat [extra:out-of-date] > Those two puzzle me. Why does mipsel build on mipsel and every other > arch but is not-for-us on mips? Unless you have a good reason not to > support mips please mention that to our leader too. Hmm.... what does Not-For-Us mean? My packages all had either Architecture: any or Architecture: all, so I don't see why this would happen. > alpha: libs/xerces24_2.4.0-2: Needs-Build [extra:out-of-date] > > Not a big surprise there, just wait or fiond someone with an alpha to > build it manually. Is this just not a big surprise because of the much-discussed long backlog? > mips, mipsel, powerpc: libs/xerces24_2.4.0-2: Not-For-Us [extra:out-of-date] > > Why do you support even less archs? I'd like to know that too. I don't think it's anything I did. How would I find out? Thanks for your helpful and thorough response. --Jay -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
