Kapil Hari Paranjape <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > Dear Frank, > > On Fri, Feb 18, 2005 at 12:39:46PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote: >> Kapil Hari Paranjape <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: >> > I have put up the promised newer version. The versioning scheme has >> > reverted to YYYYMMDD.HHMM for the pre-upload period.
Some further questions/suggestions: - I think you want to close bug #234678, but you do close #234768. - is #219482 fixed? - isn't #256834 fixed, too? ,---- | * Fixed some types in the html documentation. `---- Do you mean typos? - It is common practice to have changelog entryl like "Bumped standards version to $foo (no changes needed)", or listing the changes. - You should not depend only on a virtual package, gs, but rather use something like "Depends: gs-gpl | gs". The reason is that - I think you should remove debian/diffs... - debian/postinst: You create symlinks in postinst - why don't you include them in the deb? - debian/postrm: Why do you rm -rf /etc/tex4ht? I guess there is no consensus whether a package may delete locally generated files in their directories upon purge, some people say they shouldn't. I have no strong opinion, but here it seems that it is just unnecessary - is there a specific reason for this? - I think it is better to set dh_compat explicitly. - In the versions I downloaded, there are still lintian/linda warnings about the script and the executable font files. Regards, Frank -- Frank Küster Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich Debian Developer