Hi,

On Mon, Mar 28, 2005 at 09:37:07AM -0700, David Everly wrote:
>    Depends: (package-a,package-1,package-2) | (package-b,package-3)

As far as I remember boolean algebra, (a and b and c) or (d and e) is
equivalent to (a or d) and (a or e) and (b or d) and (b or e) and (c or
d) and (c or e). Than makes awfull dependencies, but it should work...
(And no need to duplicate the package.)

Wow... It would really be nice to enhance the syntax for dependencies...


Cheers,

Nicolas


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to