Ricardo Mones wrote:
> On Thu, 05 May 2005 10:23:19 -0400
> "Brenda J. Butler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>   Anyway your case is clearly different, your source is a kpr file not
> a pdf one.
>
>
>>If not, then how should I proceed?  I can put the .kpr, .ps and .pdf
>>in the package... I could place the .kpr, .ps and .pdf
>>in /usr/share/doc/myslides... does that sound reasonable?  Do you have
>>a better suggestion?
>
>
>   It sounds pretty reasonable to me, maybe adding a note to the
> README.Debian saying the kpr is the original source and kpresenter
> package is required to modify it, for example.

The source should of course be in the source package, but I don't see
why it needs to be in the .deb.  Other packages don't include their
sources in /usr/share/doc...  Why would it make sense to do that for
this one?

Thanks,
Bas

--
I encourage people to send encrypted e-mail (see http://www.gnupg.org).
If you have problems reading my e-mail, use a better reader.
Please send the central message of e-mails as plain text
   in the message body, not as HTML and definitely not as MS Word.
Please do not use the MS Word format for attachments either.
For more information, see http://129.125.47.90/e-mail.html

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to