-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- On Sat, 4 Apr 1998, Daniel Martin at cush wrote:
> Now my question is: how should I handle the transition for people who > have modified their /etc/X11/fvwm95/system.fvwm95rc-menu? What I'm > planning to do (I got this idea from fvwm2) is in the preinst check > whether the system.fvwm95rc-menu has been modified from the version > from the previous install, and if so print a warning message saying > something like: What I'd like is: 1. No modifications, just delete the file. 2. Otherwise inform the user to move their hand edit to the new hook files each and every time they upgrade. With your proposed scheme: warn on fvwm95-n and fail on fvwm95-(n+1); it means if I never install fvwm95-n but instead skip straight to fvwm95-(n+1) I miss out on the warning and am told that the installation isn't possible until I delete the old system.fvwm95rc-menu Anand. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.3ia Charset: noconv iQCVAwUBNSd9x2RmcAD8BdppAQGd/AP+KcqLUu6+YDJM8crdTJjZYh7ieL+SkpPR Y849QT2pUkhzE5bVbO8Xyxn5GOXxI2k/FXrgE+3Lpw3gRtWlPBl1DwIi5y3b8Jh3 CH7XLZN2Fou5+kDt5okc5CVMdErhPQSTnvgntQlfS8f0D28lwbmqNZZ5A1o9wZb+ jUki2w9oxUA= =ObVm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
