On Thu, Oct 19, 2000 at 09:32:23AM +0200, Othmar Pasteka wrote: > hi, > > i have a bugreport for a package which is solved in a new > version. and the bug report told me that it is fixed in the new > package. it's a woody package but compiled for potato but > shouldn't be a problem because it only depends on libc6. so, know > this would be a reason to be included into proposed-updates or > not? > if so i would like to know what i have to do so that it is > included into proposed-updates?
you should backport the fix to the potato version, and increase the debian
revision number, and upload to "stable" - dinstall will automatically move
that to proposed-updates correctly. chances are, it wont go into potato,
but you can try. (it has to be a valid and worthwhile fix. - make sure you
explain in detail in the changelog. that is all that is looked at during
point release)
--
Michael Beattie ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CONNECT 300... Connect 300?!?!?! #%^# NO CARRIER
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Debian GNU/Linux.... Ooohh You are missing out!
pgpFSftbZilGV.pgp
Description: PGP signature
