Jürgen A. Erhard wrote: > There are patches that simply cannot be backported. There are others > that are hard to backport even for the upstream maintainers who are > *deep* into the code. > > So demanding of a "packager" to "always be able to backport" is too > strong.
fwiw: granted. > [I find it hard not to get as slightly ad-hominem as you got, Joey :-|] Wus? Please send me a German translation for me in priv mail. > PS: I do agree that people should be able to understand the language > their package is written in. Ok. > But understanding it and backporting > something is *very* different. Ok. Regards, Joey -- GNU GPL: "The source will be with you... always." Please always Cc to me when replying to me on the lists.