On Wed, May 09, 2001 at 08:09:51PM +0200, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote: > Eric Van Buggenhaut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 09:53:44PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote: > > > It can be debianised, but it can't be included in debian, since it can't > > > be legally redistributed in binary form.
> OTOH, isn't a license just required for *using* software that falls > under the patent -- in contrast to just distributing it? How is > distributing lame different from distributing implementations of RSA > one year ago? We did that. Fair point... I thought you couldn't distribute it, though, something involving aiding & abetting? -- Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
pgpVaAkW0VokH.pgp
Description: PGP signature
