Hi all, I am working on a package for fblogo, a tool to create framebuffer logos for the kernel.
The upstream author's email isn't valid anymore and the original homepage doesn't exist either. Furthermore, the upstream source is 6k big, and the diff is allready 80k (examples etc), so wouldn't it be better if I declare myself upstream author of this tool 'based on fblogo by xyz'? Technically this would be possible as it is released under the GPL, I just wondered what was common practise in such cases. Also, I'm not sure if I should then rename the tool to distinguish it from the original one or if it would be ok to keep the name? (I have only sent an ITP, but haven't uploaded it yet to unstable as I thought my account might be created while I'm busy working on the package) Thanx, Gordon -- Gordon Fraser Our informal mission is to improve the [EMAIL PROTECTED] love life of operators worldwide. http://www.freakzone.net -- Peter Behrendt, president of Exabyte
pgpkm1FlrEfMk.pgp
Description: PGP signature
