On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 10:26:24AM +0100, Frank Küster wrote: > Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > > On Sun, Nov 02, 2003 at 08:27:28PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote: > >> in a package that I maintain (sponsored by a DD), I use a call to > >> stat. In sarge, /usr/bin/stat is in coreutils - of course I don't need a > >> dependency on that. However, in woody stat was in a separate > >> package. Usually packages keep really old versioned dependencies - this > >> might be important for upgrades, and it's friendly for backporters. [...] > >> "coreutils | stat" to the dependencies. [...] > > I don't have a sid system at hand, but doesn't coreutils > > Provides/Replaces stat? > It has > Replaces: textutils, shellutils, fileutils, stat, debianutils (<= 2.3.1) > Provides: textutils, shellutils, fileutils > Conflicts: stat > > So there's no "Provides" for stat. As far as I understood the policy, > Replaces: stat won't satisfy a dependency on stat, will it?
No it won't. cu andreas -- "See, I told you they'd listen to Reason," [SPOILER] Svfurlr fnlf, fuhggvat qbja gur juveyvat tha. Neal Stephenson in "Snow Crash"