On Mon, Jun 21, 2004 at 12:32:05PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote: > On 2004-06-07 Mattia Dongili <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, May 11, 2004 at 10:03:04AM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote: > > > On 2004-05-11 Mattia Dongili <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > [...] > > > > Subject: xfree86-driver-synaptics blocked by xserver-xfree86 on s390 > [...] > > > Personally I'd immediately change the architecture field and change it > > > back once there is a xserver for s390. - You'll probably have to > > > pester ftp-master to remove the old s390 binary, otherwise > > > xfree86-driver-synaptics will be blocked by "out of date on s390". > > > I finally opted for this solution. > [...] > > Hello, > May I ask for status update?
herm... sorry, after the suggestion from Steve Lagasek[1] I changed my mind a little (I understood the usefullness of Packages-arch-specific), see below > You have uploaded 0.13.3-1 yesterday with still "Architecture: any" > and it has therefore built and been uploaed by s390 *again*. > Futhermore there is still no request for removing the s390 binaries > from the archive on http://bugs.debian.org/ftp.debian.org I'm trying to contact ftpmaters asking them to add xfree86-driver-synaptics to Packages-arch-specific with an '!s390' entry (as xsever-xfree86 has the same entry there) and to remove the s390 binary. I haven't submitted a bug since this is not a 'complete' removal (as read on devel-ref 5.9.2) but I wrote to them directly ([EMAIL PROTECTED]). Am I wrong wrt to this procedure? thanks [1]: http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2004/06/msg00147.html -- mattia :wq!