On Fri, Jul 02, 2004 at 03:25:06PM -0700, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > On Fri, Jul 02, 2004 at 11:57:38AM -0700, William Ballard wrote: > > > Notice libfam0c102 isn't coming in with a version dependency. Is there > > to make dh_shlibdeps add that in? > > No. Why do you believe that you need to?
I dunno. That question was implicit: is libfam0c102 some "special thing" which doesn't need a version. Is it different from all the other packages, which *do* specify a verision. I don't know a thing about it. I thought either dh_shlibdeps was doing what it wanted by not writing a version, as you seem to suggest; or if I was doing something wrong.