Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 02, 2004 at 02:52:59PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote: > >> Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > Does anybody have an idea why apt decides "Holding Back tetex-bin rather >> > than change dvipdfm"? >> >> It seems it's an apt bug; after I put the tetex stuff on hold and >> dist-upgrade the rest, it works fine. > > It looks like tetex-bin obsoletes dvipdfm. It should conflict, provide and > replace it.
That's what it does, and since it does the problem occured. Was I unclear in my first mail? Indeed when updating apt first the problem vanishes, and I guess if I'd used dselect in the first place, it just wouldn't have occurred (at least this is my impression from woody's release notes). Regards, Frank -- Frank Küster, Biozentrum der Univ. Basel Abt. Biophysikalische Chemie
