Hello, The (cleaned) packages I have made are in: http://jr.falleri.free.fr/fichiers/debian/kat
I am still interrested in working on it but I don't have any objections to work with another people. If someone can tell me if there are some things to fix in it (and if not, if anybody could sponsor it :) ). Regards. 2005/9/26, Jonas Genannt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hello, > > Christoph Haas wrote: > >> Uhm. Can you explain what's going on with the ITP? > >> > >> 2005-05-14: #309068 - ITP: kat, by Jean-Remy Falleri > >> 2005-09-16: #328610 - RFP: kat, by Nicolas DEGAND > >> 2005-09-22: you retitle #328610 to ITP > >> 2005-09-22, one hour later: you merge #328610 with #309068, without > >> mention whether you've contacted Jean-Remy or not. > Sorry guys I have not really checked bts and ask Jean about this state > for packaging. > > > Jonas' package looks reasonable to me. Some minor things I'm not > > instantly happy about: > > > > - Of course the ITP/merge/RFP/RFS issue should be clarified. > If Jean would like to packages this appliaction. He should do it > because he was first. > > - The kat/doc/Makefile should probably be cleaned away. It's contained > > in the .diff.gz > > - The description of "libkat0" in the debian/rules reads > > "This package contains the katlibraries." > > I'd like to rephrase it like "This package contains the library > > that are used by the kat desktop search environment." > > - The copyright doesn't include the year of copyright. It also > > lacks the "e" of "file" at the end. > > - The README and TODO files don't look very helpful to the end-user. > > - The README.Debian doesn't contain anything that isn't found in > > the other files anyway. > But I have also fixed this erros that Christoph has reported. > > You can find this under [1] > > Greets, > Jonas > [1] http://jonas.capi2name.de/kat/ > > -- Jean-Remy Falleri [EMAIL PROTECTED]