On Wed, 2006-06-14 at 08:27 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > Thus proving that the real solution is to get rid of the Homepage bit > completely and instead add a real field to dpkg, since people won't even > agree on and follow the syntax for the hack of putting it in the long > description so that people can parse it properly. *sigh*
I don't think any part of packages (description or separate field) are the correct place for the Homepage field. Same for the watch file. The reason being is that these are things that change independently of the package. The Packages/Sources, maybe (using a system like debtags). That needs some infrastructure though, which I hope one of the SoC projects will provide (CRMI/DWTT). We love you Arnaud! -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
