-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
- -=| Sune Vuorela, 14.01.2007 12:31 |=-
> On 2007-01-14, Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> maintscripts often don't support downgrades just because downgrading has
>> always
>> been advertised as "not guaranteed to work", so very few maintainers put the
>> additional effort and clutter into their code.
>
> It is not about 'additional effort' but more like 'not being able to
> predict the future'
>
> how should the (pre|post)inst of package version 1.3 be able to undo the
> changes made in the (pre|post)inst of package version 1.5 ?
It is the other way around.
(pre|post)rm of package version 1.5 must undo the actions.
However, what exactly is undone must depend on the new version (1.3,
1.0, 0.4), which would clutter the code.
So it is no "predicting the future" but "remembering the past".
The big problem IMHO is that not everything may be undone. File format
changes come to mind.
dam
- --
Damyan Ivanov Modular Software Systems
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
phone +359(2)928-2611, 929-3993 fax +359(2)920-0994
mobile +359(88)856-6067 [EMAIL PROTECTED]/Gaim
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFFqgo5Hqjlqpcl9jsRAkpwAKC/W0B5TwR3C5rPMZQFWu5ggLR4VgCgm7EG
kR7XW/ot+ID/OJBlItoEVOg=
=X0bU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
