On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 12:34:08PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 09:01:52PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote: > > Also, in the (rare but can occur) event of a svn rollback, r91 is not > > necessarily accurate after the fact,whereas a datestamp is. > > Uh? Is "rollback" (in the sense of "undoing" a commit) possible with SVN > without manually fiddling in the repository at all?
Sure, svn merge. Greetings Marc -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Marc Haber | "I don't trust Computers. They | Mailadresse im Header Mannheim, Germany | lose things." Winona Ryder | Fon: *49 621 72739834 Nordisch by Nature | How to make an American Quilt | Fax: *49 621 72739835 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]