On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 01:33:54PM -0600, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote: > On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 06:37:28PM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 10:22:41PM -0600, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote: > > > What happens is that liferea is held-back. I've tried adding or taking > > > out a > > > Provides: liferea-gtkhtml > > > to the liferea package, with no results. > > > > I suspect you need the third horseman of the package apocalypse, Replaces:, > > Nope, no good. Still doesn't work. > > Actually, what happens at the dist-upgrade is that the *new* > liferea-xulrunner get pulled, but liferea itself is held back at the > old version and liferea-gtkhtml is not removed.
That's very odd. > Is there something wrong with calling your private's repository > distribution 'unstable'? Does having two repositories called the same > but with different contents confuse apt somehow? No, I'm pretty sure that apt works based on URLs rather than names. The release names are used by the '-t' option to apt-get, and also in pinning, but I presume that there's no pinning rules that are relevant in your apt config? - Matt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]