-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 David Paleino ha scritto: > Paco, instead, logs the "make install" activity, so you can see which files > were > stored where, and you could always add files to the log, even after the > completion of the install (that's a feature checkinstall doesn't have, if I > don't go wrong) [1].
Forgot to say, with the gpaco gui, you can easily create "binary packages" of what you did install. They are simple .tar.gz archives, which you might untar in /, and have a fully-functional software installed. By the way, I've just sent the upstream author a mail, asking him for differences between paco and checkinstall. My main point is, however, about LFS systems. paco would definitely be a good package in those cases. Feel free to comment ;-) Cheers, David - -- . ''`. Debian packager! | http://snipurl.com/gofoxygo/ : :' : User #334216 | http://www.hanskalabs.net/ `. `'` GPG: 1392B174 | http://www.debianizzati.org/ `- 2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.3 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGNbKM5qqQFxOSsXQRArMbAJ4yOr0AKqS5vHYteU9MbU/uG9fN1ACgv6Od 18tDrD2oLrtwZOHouuPdj+w= =+sPl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
