Thomas Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > (no point in hardcoding "a few dozen string" definitions, unless one > _likes_ the nasty comments that people make when they read the code ;-)
On the contrary, providing ANSI X3.64 / ECMA-048 / ISO 6429 control sequences in a library seems entirely reasonable to me. It is a standard, and it's not like they change or are system-dependent. Yes, there are terminals that don't implement those standards. How many of them are used by anyone other than hobbyists as part of computer archeology? -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
