Re-salut Cyril, Le Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 03:30:24AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois a écrit : > What about *relative* numbers, e.g. what % of the time is spent in the > build itself (gcc and friends), and what % of the time is spent in the > testsuite? Anyway, (almost) less than 1 hour everywhere isn't what I > call time-consuming from a buildd point of view.
Test time on arch (build time) 1h05 on sparc (3 min), 37 min on mipsel (2 min), 39 min on mips (3 min), 37 min on powerpc (2 min), 19 min on hppa (2 min), 6 min on amd64 (1 min)… Of course, if this is an exception, there is no need to argue. But in the Debian-Med packaging team, we have a few package whose tests are not yet enabled (bioperl, emboss,...); I do not know if it would be wise to do so systematically if they have a similar pattern of CPU usage... Or maybe in the end it would be the role of the port responsibles to micromanage this? > Popcon is no absolute knowledge. Anyway, 25+ users is far from > negligible AFAICT. Sure, but we are talking og 0.1 % of 25+ users. So if for one popcon report there are 10 instalations, it still makes only 0.25 user. And this includes the persons who downoladed the package but are not using it. Bonne journée, -- Charles Plessy http://charles.plessy.org Wakō, Saitama, Japan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
