Jose Luis Rivas Contreras wrote:
> Cristian Greco wrote:
> [some text missing]
>>> Also, what is the status on renaming the current libtorrent to
>>> libtorrent-rakshasha to avoid confusion?
>> As I know, there have been no further discussion about this.
> 
> Hi, I as the maintainer of libtorrent would like to say that I don't
> believe there's some need for renaming the library, is not that if you
> write `aptitude install libtorrent' the rakshasa libtorrent will be
> installed (it's called libtorrent10), there's libtorrent-ruby too and
> isn't conflicting with libtorrent rakshasa name so there's no really
> need, I believe.
> 
> Regards.

That makes sense.  How about a change in the short description, instead?
 apt-cache search libtorrent should make it clear that it's the
rakshasha one.

Thanks,
Scott Ritchie


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to