Laurent Léonard <laur...@open-minds.org> writes: > I agree with that. My question only concerns thx "+dfsgX" versioning > instead of a simple "+dfsg" suffix in this case where there is only 1 > documentation file dropped for DFSG reason.
Given that +dfsg1 sorts after +dfsg anyway, I think it's fine to omit the version number if you expect not to need it. I plan on starting to omit the version number after dfsg in the next upstream release for some of my repackaged source packages where the repackaging has been stable for quite some time. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org