Hi Ben,

Comparisons like “clone of foopackage, but different” aren't very
> helpful in the synopsis. (They are fine in the long description though.)
>

I found it with that description, and seems that was long time.
But if description is not appropriate, So I can change it


> Better would be to spend the limited synopsis space to say what the
> package *is*, rather than what it is like or what it is not. In the
> synopsis it's okay to be similar to other packages; the long description
> can be used for distinctions.


Ok, I will take it into account. But first I would like first, the upstream
author's  opinion or some mentor.
I think may be: popular command-line mp3 player
(according to: http://mpg321.sourceforge.net/)

Thanks so much, Ben


Elías

Reply via email to