Le Mon, 3 Aug 2009 14:13:34 +0200, Paul Wise <p...@debian.org> a écrit :
> There are an awful lot of changes to the code in the diff.gz and many > of these seem to be unnessecary because they only change a date in a > comment. Any other changes should be forwarded upstream. I did not notice this problem. Seems due to the test target. I will investigate. > The latest Standards-Version is 3.8.2, please read the upgrading.txt > in debian-policy and make any needed changes. I will check for this > > The package description contains a lot of jargon, you might want to > get debian-l10n-english to review it. I did not know about this. thanks. > Why is there build.xml and debian/build.xml? I remove it from the debian directory as I took it from the current upstream CVS. The 1.0.7 release do not provide the ant build file. > Based on the copyright file, you've repacked the tarball, a > get-orig-source target in debian/rules might be appropriate. Do you have a link to explain how to write this rule ? > You can probably remove all of the comment and empty lines from the > watch file, however the watch file will not work because upstream > ships their code in a zip file instead of a tar.gz. > Must I send a bug to the upstream for them to also package a tar.gz ? Thanks Frederic -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org