In <20090804100620.ga8...@shurick.s2s.msu.ru>, Alexander Inyukhin wrote: >Socket permissions are controlled by umask, but if security >matters, a more sophisticated way of managing sockets should be used. >Since task-spooler is intented for use in single user environment, >I do not think this is a serious issue.
Unfortunately, Debian is not limited to use as a single-user environment so you may need to revisit the security implications. At the very least, you may want to warn the administrator that it is not suitable for multi-user environments. Any reason task-spooler can't secure it's sockets the same way ssh-agent and/or gpg-agent secure theirs? -- Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. ,= ,-_-. =. b...@iguanasuicide.net ((_/)o o(\_)) ICQ: 514984 YM/AIM: DaTwinkDaddy `-'(. .)`-' http://iguanasuicide.net/ \_/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
