I dislike the duplication and the iceweasel/mozilla style license[1]. That said it is not my role to decide about uploading ttf-takao or removing otf-ipafont.
It is a shame IPA doesn't use standard FLOSS practices like releasing early and often. 1. I also dislike DFSG #4 a lot. At least it isn't the SIL OFL, which prevents us from building the binary font file from source in the case where the author has specified a reserved font name. -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/i2te13a36b31004032320z4cdea01u7c4cf312898e8...@mail.gmail.com
