On 9 April 2010 22:35, Mats Erik Andersson <mats.anders...@gisladisker.se> wrote: > Lastly, it is probably better to revert to the initial version '0.1.5-1', > since otherwise the closing of the ITP-bug would be lost. The only text > needed in the changelog would then be > > * Initial release. (Closes: #539665) > > together with standard headline and timed footer.
I probably agree with this advice, although note that dpkg-genchanges has a '-v' option that can be used to include changelog entries from more than just the most recent release. The bugs in the BTS are actually closed by a field in the generated '.changes' file, rather than a script parsing the changelog itself. In the past, I believe some sponsors have asked that every revision of the package uploaded by a mentee has a separate changelog entry, although personally I don't agree with that approach - for me, it's better that the changelog clearly documents what was uploaded to Debian itself. -- Tim Retout <t...@retout.co.uk> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/n2hc9f2b3df1004091437w76407d0at2cbd07b994740...@mail.gmail.com