Hi there. On Jun 21 2010, Michael Gilbert wrote: > On Mon, 21 Jun 2010 01:05:57 -0300 Rogério Brito wrote: > > * Would you consider including the latest versin of the zooming patch > > that I sent you? > > Where is that at? Has it been well-tested? The previous zoom patch > broke a bunch of other things, and I've disabled it for now. If this > new version has been sufficiently tested, I will consider it.
Please, notice that I am not talking about the zoom to fit, height or anything else. I am talking about higher zoom factors, that I posted here: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=10;filename=flexibilize-zoom-levels.patch;att=1;bug=580495 It was one of the first things that I did as soon as I started hacking on xpdf. It is quite stable and should also work with vanilla xpdf. > > * minor thing: since we are not shipping a library, there isn't a very > > strict requirement of the transitional binary packages be steplocked > > with the main binary. Therefore, the binary:Version substitution > > variable could be relaxed to source:Version (there won't be a problem > > with binNMU's). > > I tried a couple ways of doing this, and they all resulted in lintian > errors; whereas the current approach doesn't, so I'm sticking with it. > A patch is welcome. I just went ahead and changed things on the package at collab-maint. I did not include my patch above, though, since I want you to see it (but I am using it and it works well). > Thanks for your review! You're welcome. Regards, -- Rogério Brito : rbr...@{ime.usp.br,gmail.com} : GPG key 1024D/7C2CAEB8 http://rb.doesntexist.org : Packages for LaTeX : algorithms.berlios.de DebianQA: http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=rbrito%40ime.usp.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100621053912.ga11...@ime.usp.br